Lake-backed Swedish studies and public-league analytical notes — all in one Research feed. Prefer pieces marked as MotherDuck-sourced when you need citable numbers.
PP% is a lagging indicator. Zone entry rate on the power play and back-to-back PK goals are the leading signals that actually predict Conference Finals outcomes. Here is the 2026 data for all four teams.
PP deployment data, zone entry types, and unit construction for Conference Finals 2026. Why deployment volume and controlled entry rate predict power play performance better than PP% alone.
Trailing-state 5v5 analytics for Conference Finals 2026 — xGF% when behind, offensive zone time recovery, and which teams can actually chase games versus which ones collapse structurally under score pressure.
Zone entry data through the first three games of the 2026 Conference Semifinals reveals a clear split: Edmonton leads all teams at 57% carry-in rate while Boston operates at 64% dump-in. Here is what the data shows and what it means for each series.
Zone exits determine who controls the game in May hockey. Here is how all eight Conference Semifinal teams are breaking out under forecheck pressure — with controlled exit rates, failed exit analysis, and team-by-team breakdowns.
The Norris Trophy conversation defaults to points, but the award is for greatest all-round ability. Here is how Makar, Dahlin, and Werenski compare on the defensive side using 5v5 rate metrics, zone entry prevention, and defensive GAR.